(Home-My Story).......                 True, Tragic and Unnecessary Gay Youth Suicide Stories......................        .(Español) 

.

PART 2 - Page 5 of 34
Difficult to Understand and Ambiguous Scriptures
The Problems with Bible Translations in General and With This Translation In Particular
Is Evangelical Christianity The Antichrist?

1 Corinthians 6:9-10

malakoi and arsenokoitai

There is a huge disagreement about what these two words mean!

And yet they are translated to mean "Homosexual",
a word that wasn't coined until the mid to late 19th century???

 

1 Corinthians 6:9-10 9Don’t you realize that those who do wrong will not inherit the Kingdom of God? Don’t fool yourselves. Those who indulge in sexual sin, or who worship idols, or commit adultery, or are male prostitutes (malakoi), or practice homosexuality(arsenokoitai), 10or are thieves, or greedy people, or drunkards, or are abusive, or cheat people—none of these will inherit the Kingdom of God. (New Living Translation) (http://www.biblegateway.com/ is a great site to do research in the Bible)

The understanding of this passage of scripture as it relates to Paul’s teaching about men having sex with other men (sex between females is virtually ignored in the Bible) depends on the translation of 2 Greek words, “malakoi” and “arsenokoitai”. There has been and remains a great disparity and lack of consensus among Bible translations and commentaries as to what these two terms mean. In this text these words occur in a list of sinners of various kinds. It is hard to determine what these words mean in the way they are used because the words don’t have a context to help suggest a meaning except that it was someone doing something that was considered very wrong. They are just words in a list. (1)

Malakoi” was a fairly common word (a plural adjective used as a noun) and it seems to have at least 3 possible meanings. The first meaning was “soft”, “fine” or “expensive” as used in Luke 7:25 and Matthew 11:8 when talking about a rich man’s clothes. The second was “effeminate” or “woman like”, but not necessarily in the “limp wrist (gay)” implication we give to those words today but with the idea of someone being “undisciplined”, “self-indulgent”, “decadent”, “lazy”, “easily influenced”, “without courage or stability” or “gentle in nature-like a woman”. The third being a young male prostitute or call-boy, a youth who consciously imitated feminine styles and ways and took on
the passive role of a woman during sex for money. It appears that the third would be the most likely meaning as Robin Scroggs in The New Testament and Homosexuality points out on page 106, especially likely when found together with the word “arsenokoitai” and because it was found within a list of the worst possible sins. The practice of boy prostitution would have been known to Paul and it was universally detested in the Jewish community.

Now “arsenokoitai” is a word even more difficult to explain because this use in the Bible is the first recorded use of the word combined with the fact that it is found so rarely in other literature of the time and only in lists of vices. It only occurs in the Bible in this verse and in 1Timothy 1:10. The word is a compound of two parts, the first part meaning “male”, the second part “bed” or “beds”. But trying to put them together to come up with a meaning as many experts do is not necessarily reliable because language is not always logical. For example the word “lady-killer” in English means neither a lady who kills nor a person who kills ladies but a man who knows how to charm women. (2)

 

But to make a long and tedious analysis short the evidence does seem to show that arsenokoitai refers to male same-sex behavior that is exploitative, lewd and wanton, where one man forces himself sexually on another or takes advantage of and uses the services of boy prostitutes, always in the active role as the penetrator (never the passive).  Click Here for a really good analysis of arsenokoitai (in a pdf file) in Justin R. Cannon's study entitled, The Bible, Christianity & Homosexuality.  So you don't have to buy the book.  
 

OK, but what do these 2 words have to do with two people of the same sex living in a committed, monogamous, loving relationship with the blessing of God?

A Woman Was Treated Little Better Than A Slave
I strongly believe that the meaning of words depends on the context in which they are used. So in order to truly understand how the lessons of the Bible can be applied to our lives in today’s world we must try to understand the world in which the Bible was written. Now in this case, both of these words are closely tied to a 1st century cultural context vastly different from our own. As an example of this huge cultural difference, in the strict patriarchies of Biblical times, men and women played far different roles than they do today, at least in what we call "Western nations". Women were rarely educated in ancient times (an intellectual conversation with a woman was not considered possible) and they were literally owned by, yes they were the property of their husbands (or their fathers before their marriage) and they had no real legal or political status. The wife was responsible for the household and usually stayed indoors with the slaves following her husband’s instructions. The husband was the public face of the family and it seems spent little time at home during the day or in conversations with his wife. Therefore if another man had sex with his wife, yes it was adultery, but in the sense that it was a form of stealing, an infringement of the husband's property rights. And this is only one example of these cultural context differences. The examples could go on and on seemingly forever.

Malakoi and Arsenokoitai Have Been Translated To Mean Many Different Things Over The Centuries
So recognizing these cultural context differences between modern and ancient times has added much to our understanding of how the teachings in the Bible should be understood and put to use in our lives. In this case all these differences have been taken into consideration plus the best investigative researchers from various scientific fields have been brought in to try and arrive at a definitive answer, but it all hasn’t seemed to help much and the wide disagreement continues on as to what these two words mean. The truth is that the precise meanings may never be known. The result is that scholars have been reduced to making educated guesses. John J. McNeill wrote in The Church and the Homosexual, "The variation in translations points to the fact that there is very little understanding of the precise meaning of Paul's [two] terms . . . Translations appear at times to be based on preconceptions rather than serious scholarship." (3) Click Here to go to page 11 on my website where I give another example of a translator's prejudice in the Fifth Reason, headed The Problems with Bible Translations.  Another example of how strange translations can be: There are some people from Martin Luther’s time and even some now that believed then and believe now that “arsenokoitai” and/or “malakoi refer to masturbators. Hum. In that case would that mean that most teenage boys are going straight to hell? Ha-ha. 

The results of these educated guesses, which most likely includes the changing prejudices taken from the society in which these translators lived [note that as prejudices changed over the centuries, so have the Biblical translations for these two Greek words (4)], as I will talk about later, are reflected below in all the variety of different Biblical translations in English over the centuries up to the present for these two ancient Greek words in 1 Corinthians 6:9-10 - First “malakoi” and then “arsenokoitai” in the phrases below, but sometimes they are combined into one meaning:

 

To read about the other important reason that the word homosexual should never appear in the Bible Click Here.

In English: (original source: http://christiangays.com/articles/malakoi.shtml Subsequently permission was received from the author, Jeramy Townsley(http://www.jeramyt.org/), to use his chart in this presentation.

Version Year Translation Translation
Koine Greek 56
A. D.
malakoi
1 Corinthians 6:9-10
arsenokoitai
1 Corinthians 6:9-10
1Timothy 1:10
Latin Vulgate 405 molles masculorum
concubitores
Wyclif 1508 lecchouris synne of Sodom
Tyndale 1525 weaklings abusers of themselves
with mankynde
Great Bible 1539 weaklynges abusers of themselves
with mankynde
Bishops Bible 1568 effeminate liers with mankinde
Reims-Douai 1609 effeminate liers with mankind
King James Authorized Version 1611 effeminate abusers of themselves
with mankind
The Revised Version 1811 effeminate abusers of themselves
with men
Darby 1890 those who make women
of themselves
abuse themselves
with men
Young 1898 effeminate sodomites
American Standard Version 1901 effeminate abusers of themselves
with men
Wesley's New Testament 1938 guilty of unnatural crime  
Revised Standard Version 1946 homosexual-(1st use of word homosexual in the Holy Bible. This outrageous translation in Gary Lynn's opinion almost rises to the level of blasphemy because this text has been used as a sledgehammer against us causing unending harm including death in the name of God - Click Here to read more)
Goodspeed 1951 sensual given to unnatural vice
Jerusalem Bible (French) 1955 effeminate people with infamous
habits
Phillips 1958 effeminate pervert
Interlinear Greek-English
New Testament
1958 voluptuous persons Sodomites
The Amplified Version 1958 those who participate in
homosexuality
 
New English 1961 homosexual perversion  
New American Standard
Bible
1963 effeminate homosexuals
Today's English Version 1966 homosexual perverts  
Jerusalem Bible (German) 1968 sissies child molesters
Jerusalem Bible (English) 1968 Catamites Sodomites
New American Catholic 1970 homosexual perverts sodomites
Revised Standard Version 1971 sexual perverts  
The Living Bible 1971 homosexuals  
New International Version 1978 male prostitutes homosexual offenders
New King James 1979 homosexuals sodomites
New Jerusalem Bible 1985 self indulgent sodomites
New American Catholic 1987 boy prostitutes practicing homosexuals
Revised English Bible 1989 sexual pervert  
New Revised Standard 1989 male prostitutes sodomites
New Living Translation 1996 male prostitutes homosexuals
Third Millennium Bible 1998 effeminate abusers of themselves
with mankind

Two observations from Gary Lynn: 1) As believers, we take the Bible, though written down by humans, to be the divinely inspired Word of God (at least in the Church of Christ (Christian Church), the church I was raised in). We believe that this is the essential information that God wanted us here on earth to know in order for us to lead the best possible lives in this life and give us the best possible chance to spend eternity with Him in the next. For example, we know exactly the meaning of “You shall not murder" or "You shall not steal". There is no doubt what God wants us to know in these 2 important commandments. So, if these two words, “malakoi” and “arsenokoitai” are so critical for us to understand in order to achieve the previously mentioned goals or rewards, wouldn’t God with all His limitless powers, wisdom and foreknowledge have made it possible for their meaning to be clear to either the lay reader or the scholar today?

2) The Fundamentalists believe that all scripture is "God Breathed" in other words according to Grace Community Church's John MacArthur, "the Scriptures are breathed out by God, not breathed in. So they say that the Bible is the product of God breathing out His words so what He wanted written got written. In other words, the Scriptures are the product of divine breath assuring us that the sixty-six books of the Bible are the very words of God." So maybe all this lack of clarity on God's part in the case of malakoi” and “arsenokoitaiis a test for His People. Could He be testing us to see that when there is any clear doubt about what is written, that we turn to loving instead of judging? 

I strongly disagree with the "God Breathed" point of view because it says that the entire bible is inerrant or without error and that is just wrong.  My faith is in no way shaken because there are human-induced errors in the Holy Bible.  I express my views in more detail Here on this subject. 

-

The Bible and Homosexuality: Why I Left College and Spent Two Years Finding Out What the Scriptures Really Say  (Article plus 2 VIDEOS-Trailer 4 minutes + Presentation 1 hour) by Matthew Vines-President, The Reformation Project
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

"Every generation has its hot-button issue," writes David P. Gushee, "For us, it's the LGBT issue." In Changing Our Mind, Gushee takes the reader along his personal and theological journey as he changes his mind about gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender inclusion in the Church. "For decades now, David Gushee has earned the reputation as America's leading evangelical ethicist. In this book, he admits that he has been wrong on the LGBT issue." writes Brian D. McLaren, author and theologian. Published February, 2015

 

 
DEFINITIONS
(I put these definitions together using a variety of source material):
weakling = someone who is weak in body, character or mind.

liers with mankind
= almost as vague as the original Greek word “arsenokoitai” itself, but thought by many to mean sodomite (see definition below) or men who lie down or sleep with other men to have sexual relations (as with a woman).

abusers of themselves with mankind
= almost as vague as the original Greek word “arsenokoitai” itself, but thought by many to mean sodomite (see definition below) or men who lie down or sleep with other men to have sexual relations (as with a woman).

effeminate
= having feminine qualities not typical of a man.

those who make women of themselves
= probably means men who are effeminate or call-boys/male prostitutes.

guilty of unnatural crime
= vague but could mean someone who is accused of or guilty of doing something sexually that is culturally forbidden in that society.

sensual =
self-indulgent or deficient in moral, spiritual or intellectual qualities or interests.

given to unnatural vice
= vague but could mean someone who does something sexually that is culturally forbidden in that society.

people with infamous habits
= vague but could mean someone who does something sexually that is culturally forbidden in that society.

voluptuous persons
= people who are self-indulgent or deficient in moral, spiritual or intellectual qualities or interests.

sexual pervert/pervert
= one given to some form of sexual practice which is unnatural, unusual or considered wrong by the society in which they live.

sissies
= street or slang term for men or boys considered effeminate which could include being timid or cowardly.

child molesters
= adult men or women who touch or interact in any way with underage or minor boys or girls for the purpose of their sexual gratification.

sodomite
= one who has anal or oral intercourse with a member of the same or opposite sex.

self-indulgent
= excessive or unrestrained gratification of one’s own appetites, desires or whims.

partakers in homosexuality
= a little vague but probably means a heterosexual or homosexual man or woman who takes part in same-sex sexual acts

homosexuals
= men (gays) and women (lesbians) who are innately or naturally sexually attracted or oriented to members of their own sex.

practicing homosexuals
= homosexuals who follow through with their homosexual orientation by actively looking for and entering into same sex relationships. They are not celibate or asexual.

catamite
= a prepubescent or adolescent beardless boy kept by a pederast. These days this term is used when it is primarily a sexual relationship with little or no educational element involved.

pederast =
an adult male lover of prepubescent or adolescent beardless boys or one who practices anal intercourse especially with a prepubescent or adolescent beardless boy. These days this term is used when it is primarily a sexual relationship with little or no educational element involved.
 


                                             

 

 

Is Evangelical Christianity The Antichrist?

by Chris Kratzer - April 7, 2016


There is great speculation in regards to the reality and essence of the antichrist. Differing descriptions are given throughout the Bible, many of which have been leveraged by Hollywood-style dramatization. Be it a real person or government— many entities or a singular manifestation, the one thing that holds all viewpoints in common is the clear presence of an anti-Christ spirit that stands against Jesus in action, word, and creed.

For many, the predominant conclusion is that the antichrist is some kind of carnal, sin-dripping, non-believing, God-hating entity from the world that desires to thwart all things Christ, especially when viewed as a singular, eschatological figure. Popular, individual candidates have been Hitler, Obama, Caesar, and Napoleon.

For those Christians who paint with a broader brush, identifying the antichrist is centered on looking for the brightest blip on the radar screen of organizations, ideologies, and cultural realities believed to be wielding the most anti-Christian, sin-seductive activity in the world. Homosexuality, ISIS, and liberalism have been frequently declared as primary contenders.

Bottom line, whoever or whatever is determined to be deserving of this diabolical label, the “antichrist” serves as yet another “they” or “them” that fundamentalists can rage against and leverage with fear for the conversion of souls.

It all seems so cut and dry, does it not? Revealing the antichrist is simply a conservative Christian, finger-point away.

Not so fast.

If you asked Jesus to cast a spotlight, revealing a person or people who are best qualified for the antichrist label, He wouldn’t bull’s-eye a demonic candidate from the sinning world, not even a Herod, a Pontius Pilate, or the likes of a Roman Empire— though all certainly anti-Jesus in their own way. Rather, His eyes would gaze straight into the heart of the religious, as they have pierced many times before.

“Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You travel over land and sea to win a single convert, and when you have succeeded, you make them twice as much a child of hell as you are.” –Matthew 23:15

"Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You are like whitewashed tombs, which look beautiful on the outside but on the inside are full of the bones of the dead and everything unclean. In the same way, on the outside you appear to people as righteous but on the inside you are full of hypocrisy and wickedness.” –Matthew 23:17-28

In the same way, I find it interesting when examining the primary biblical descriptions used by conservatives in determining the antichrist, or a spirit thereof.

“Let no one deceive you in any way. For that day will not come, unless the rebellion comes first, and the man of lawlessness is revealed, the son of destruction” -2 Thessalonians 2:3

“By this you know the Spirit of God: every spirit that confesses that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is from God, and every spirit that does not confess Jesus is not from God. This is the spirit of the antichrist, which you heard was coming and now is in the world already.” 1 John 4:2-3

On the surface, it would seem these two passages serve as a slam dunk for conservative Christians in the identifying of the antichrist as a worldly, liberal, pantheistic, wayward, sin-loving, Jesus-debunking, progressive-minded entity who dwells outside of their Christian fundamentalism.

However, a deeper look reveals something much different.

First, the “lawless” person described in 2 Thessalonians is widely misunderstood. It’s a reference often used by conservatives as a clear determination that the antichrist is one whose lifestyle is characterized by licentiousness and a blatant disregard for doing what is right and good in the eyes of God. Therefore, the antichrist is easily revealed by their disobedient, sinful, morally rebellious actions. Find a person or reality that is living or advocating choices of sin, and there you have it— easy peasy, lemon squeezy, you’re the next contestant on “The Antichrist is Right.”

However, “lawlessness” can’t be referring to the Law or fulfilling any kind of legalistic, moral standard or spirit thereof through personal performance, as Paul declared, we are “under Grace, not Law.” In fact, it is under this Grace that Jesus flips the tables of religious thinking and ushers in a radical new way of calibrating our life and living, turning our attention fully away from any efforts to appease God (Law) through our faithfulness, to a focus on simply loving people (a life of Grace).

“A new commandment I give to you, that you love one another; as I have loved you, that you also love one another.” John 13:34

Click Here to continue reading
. . . . . . . . . . . .

 

Note from Gary Lynn: I include this aggressive article on my website as a discussion starter and not my final opinion on this subject. Once you have clicked on the link to finish the article please read the reader comments as they will help you give the points made in the article a frame of reference.
 

 . . . . . . . . . . . . .
 Footnotes:
(1)
Scroggs, Robin, The New Testament and Homosexuality, Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1983, page 103.
(2) Miner, Jeff (pastor of the Jesus Metropolitan Community Church in Indianapolis, Indiana), John Tyler Connoley (who recently completed a Masters in Biblical Studies at  
     Earlham School of Religion-A Quaker University) The Children are Free, Indianapolis, Indiana, Jesus Metropolitan Community Church, 2002, page 19.
(3) McNeill, John J., The Church and the Homosexual-Fourth Edition, Boston, Beacon Press, 1993, page 51.
(4) Helminiak, Daniel A., PH.D., What the Bible Really Says About Homosexuality, New Mexico Alamo Square Press, 2000, page 106-107: The Catholic Church's recent New American Bible invites cynicism. . . . . . . It translated arsenokoitai as "practicing homosexuals." How amazing! A first-century text would now seem to teach exactly what Roman Catholicism began teaching only in the mid-1970's: to be homosexual is not fault, but to engage in homogenital acts is wrong. The attempt to nuance the translation is certainly understandable and welcome.  Still, this translation reads a whole new worldview into the original Greek text, for there was no elaborated awareness of sexual orientation in first-century Christianity. Even worse, "practicing homosexuals" - like "homosexuals" and " homosexual perverts" in those other translations - includes women as well as men.  But as we shall see [as pointed out above], arsenokoitai certainly refers only to men.  At the instigation of Dignity/USA, a support group for lesbian and gay Catholics and their friends, the editors of the New American Bible agreed to delete the term practicing homosexuals.  In its place they substituted sodomites, which is hardly much better. 


A Gay Teen Short Story ♂♂
GOD MADE ME THIS WAY by Grant Bentley

Church is so confusing for Zack.  His new pastor preaches nothing but hate and condemnation of gays and lesbians, but no matter how carefully he reads his Bible, he can’t find where it says God hates him.  Will things change when Zach's boyfriend Billy suggests that they all go to his church instead?    Click Here or on the icon to read the story.

 


Click for Page 6 - So What Exactly is the Bible Against?


Click below to go to:
The Anti-Gay Religious Right's Really Cruel and Idiotic Argument
Their Message to a Gay Person is: Be alone. Live alone. Die alone.


Click for Homosexuality is neither a Choice nor a Sin - Table of contents

Click for Gary Lynn's Home Page

2,123,729 visitors and counting as of December 1, 2015  

Green Web Hosting! This site hosted by DreamHost.